IDS Mannheim - Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik - Beihefte

Band 91

Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik - Beihefte

Band 91:: Davies, Winifred V.: Linguistic variation and language attitudes in Mannheim-Neckarau. XI/224 S. - Stuttgart: Steiner, 1995.
ISBN: 3-515-06834-1

Dieser Band ist im IDS verfügbar:

IDS-Bibliothek: Sig. QD 1202

Preface		S. VII
List of Abbreviations and Transcription conventions		S. XII

1.	Introduction	S. 1
2.	Previous research into linguistic variation and attitudes	S. 3
3.	Methods of data collection	S. 33
4.	The social meaning of linguistic varieties	S. 47
5.	Dialect and standard in speakers' perceptions	S. 101
6.	Linguistic usage in the interview situation	S. 118
7.	Conclusion	S. 162

Bibliography		S. 166
Appendices		S. 183

Rein, Kurt L. (1997): Rezension von: Winifred V. Davies: Linguistic Variation and Language Attitudes in Mannheim-Neckarau (Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik. Beihefte. N.F. Nr. 91). In: Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik 64.1. Stuttgart: Steiner. S. 102-103.

Preface			S. VII
List of Abbreviations and Transcription conventions			S. XII

1.	Introduction		S. 1
2.	Previous research into linguistic variation and attitudes		S. 3
2.1.		Introduction	S. 3
2.2.		Dialectological and sociolinguistic surveys	S. 3
2.3.		Mannheim	S. 26
2.4.		The present study	S. 31
3.	Methods of data collection		S. 33
3.1.		Neckarau	S. 33
3.2.		Questionnaire and interview	S. 35
3.3.		Informants	S. 39
3.4.		Integration index	S. 41
3.5.		Limitations of the methodology	S. 45
4.	The social meaning of linguistic varieties		S. 47
4.1.		The social meaning of ‘Neckarauerisch’	S. 47
4.2.		The social meaning of Standard German	S. 91
4.3.		Conclusion	S. 99
5.	Dialect and standard in speakers' perceptions		S. 101
5.1.		‘Wer (…) redet, wie man heute in Neckarau redet?’	S. 101
5.2.		The Karch speaker	S. 111
5.3.		Conclusion	S. 117
6.	Linguistic usage in the interview situation		S. 118
6.1.		Alleged linguistic usage	S. 118
6.2.		Actual linguistic usage	S. 123
6.3.		‘Umgangssprache’?	S. 145
6.4.		Conclusion	S. 159
7.	Conclusion		S. 162

Bibliography			S. 166
Appendices			S. 183
I.		Comments on ‘Urneckarauerisch’	S. 183
II.		Linguistic biographies of informants	S. 196
III.		Questionnaire	S. 197
IV.		Transcripts of the four test speakers	S. 200
V.		Transcripts of speech samples analysed in Chapter 6	S. 202