Congressional hearings are often the most requested government documents in US libraries. However, among the genres that have been traditionally of interest to political discourse analysts – e.g. political speeches, political interviews, policy documents – hearings have not been of much scrutiny on the part of discourse scholars, an attitude somehow contrasting with the lay public’s interest. Cinzia Giglioni takes the opportunity to gain a unique view into the actors, the interested parties, the issues, from a linguistic and rhetorical perspective. Her intent is to provide an in-depth analysis of witnesses’ opening statements, which are probably the most salient parts in a congressional hearing. The investigation begins with, but is not constricted by, theoretical aspects, which are integrated with empirical observations and suggestions for critical reading.
Inhaltsverzeichnis
Acknowledgements | S. 9 | ||
1. | Introduction | S. 11 | |
2. | Defining the object of investigation: Congressional hearings as a genre of political discourse | S. 21 | |
3. | Apologetic discourse in congressional hearings | S. 29 | |
4. | Moves structure and self-representation in witnesses’ opening statement | S. 45 | |
5. | Different types of congressional hearing: rhetorical organisation and authors’ stance | S. 65 | |
6. | The mediatisation of political discourse: the case of congressional hearings | S. 89 | |
Short concluding remarks | S. 115 | ||
References | S. 117 | ||
Appendix I: List of congressional hearings and news articles | S. 129 | ||
Appendix II: Materials | S. 133 |